FairReason.com, Liberty, Empathy Knowledge & Reason

  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
Home News Atheism & Religion
Atheism & Religion

How About A REAL Challenge to Theism?

E-mail Print PDF
Submitted By
Russ Williams

I have grown quite tired of the ad nauseum attempts to scientifically excoriate theistic belief. Further, I find the entire idea of being defined by my disbelief in one particular fantasy rather silly. I think it is time that reasoning individuals come to terms with the fact that faith based belief systems are not verifiable. The idea of challenging theists in scientific terms with rules of engagement and common factual touchstones is the atheist's folly. A "truth" in a faith based belief system is whatever a believer determines it to be. There is no quantity of reason or amount of logical dissection that is going to convince or convert faith based believers from their inherited or chosen fantasy. All motivations aside, way too much energy is being wasted in these futile attempts.

 

"There is no Big Brother in the Sky"

E-mail Print PDF
Submitted By
Russ Williams

There is NO evidence that a grand puppetmaster exists. There isn't an omniscient, supernatural being who watches our every move. We are not slaves to some overlord in some other dimension, being given rewards for good behavior or punishment for being bad. Hitchens is correct, it is absurd to think that some supernatural being can read our minds, police our thoughts, and then dole out punishments for those thoughts that are not to his liking.

I wouldn't be so disrespectful as to send this video to people first like many of the religious people I know are intentionally or unintentionally sending me religious stuff, but for every evangelizing and religious propaganda email I get, I feel like sending this video response in return. (Then would have to deal with their persecution complex afterwards from some who say I am being disrespectful, or that I am going to hell, or whatever they want to make up in frustration because I cannot believe as they do and sent them something with my point of view.)

There is no Big Brother in the sky


 

Prayer requests and the atheist . . . .

E-mail Print PDF
Submitted By
Russ Williams

Since I have been a member of a certain semi-private social network website, I can’t tell you how many times I have read “please pray for . . . ” or “we will pray for you”, “we will keep you in our prayers”, etc. Just today someone posted that her little baby grandson is going to be having heart surgery on Friday and requested prayers. A good friend is awaiting a kidney transplant so that she will not die. She requests prayers. The list of comments that follow is quite long with extreme deity invoking that somehow makes my “you’re in my thoughts” seem insufficient. It would be terribly inappropriate for me to say what I want to say….if your god is willing to help you now, then why did he not prevent you from getting these diseases and problems in the first place?

I truly and genuinely care about my god-believing family and friends, and I want to offer support but I always feel that language fails me at such moments, and that I end up not really knowing what to say that sounds as concerned or caring as the magical incantations. There’s often a very fine line between appropriate and offensive which we must be careful of in people’s “time of need”. What we really want to say would be cruel when people are worried, sick and needing their god crutch.

So, what is an appropriate thing for the atheist to say? I try to direct my comments to the doctors and staff, that I am sure they will do all they can for the person who is ill. If a person is going through some sort of life crisis, financial or otherwise, all I can say is “I hope things work out” and that would be the honest truth. There is no way I could ever bring myself to be a hypocrite and write that they are in my prayers or whatever like everyone else.

What should an atheist offer instead of prayers?

 

Masochistic for Jesus

E-mail Print PDF
Submitted By
Russ Williams

It’s not only the muslims who are into self-flagellation and masochistic acts, many Christians do it too. Many of them love being a martyr for their imaginary friend. And it’s all so utterly unnecessary. When religion isn’t involved when people hurt themselves, they are usually put away in a mental institution for their own protection. When a person hurts himself in the name of religion, they are recommended for “sainthood” instead of the funny farm.

This story caught my eye when browsing the headlines. Respected leader of the Catholic Church, John Paul II used a belt to whip himself:

 

After disaster stikes, many god believers become even more delusional

E-mail Print PDF
Submitted By
Russ Williams

First of all, I want to say that the earthquake disaster is horrific, and I encourage all to donate whatever you can to whatever charity you choose to help the victims of the quake get clean water, food,clothing and medical care.

It happens everywhere in the world where there are god believers in times of disaster. They say that their god brought this upon them, that their god saves some and brings miracles of survival to others, lets some come through it all unscathed while others perish. And while they fear this invisible entity for which there is no evidence of its existence, they also continue to praise their gods, even more likely to praise their gods in the worst of times.

LINK: Haitians praise their god after apocalyptic quake


 
  • «
  •  Start 
  •  Prev 
  •  1 
  •  2 
  •  3 
  •  4 
  •  5 
  •  6 
  •  7 
  •  8 
  •  9 
  •  Next 
  •  End 
  • »


Page 1 of 9

Login

Please login to see
your Profile Complete Bar

Quotes

Submitted By
Russ Williams

"Most people would rather die than think, and most people do. "

Bertrand Russell

Submit Articles

We encourage the submission of your original articles, news and opinions. Once you have submitted an article and it is published on FairReason.com, you will be granted "Publisher" status. This means that your articles will then be automatically published without initial review.

Russ Williams

FairReason.com